I started down that path... got pretty close and realized that this
may not work as I'd wanted.    I'd wanted something that would
periodically check and update the node record (say every 5+ minutes or
so) with the current load average.  However, "slurmd" only wakes up
and processes when it receives a message from slurmctld.  AFAICT, it'd
only reevaluate cpu load (i.e. run through the "get*" functions) when
sent a "reconfigure" message.

Or have I got that wrong?

Thanks

M

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Moe Jette <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> SLURM is designed to allocate and use resource (e.g. CPUs and memory)
> rather than monitor CPU load and use that as a basis for scheduling.
> Although that feature has been requested in the past, there are no
> immediate plans to work on it.
>
> Right now the load average is not collected, although that would be
> simple to add. The USE_CPU_SPEED logic is designed to capture the
> CPU's performance in a cluster with different CPUs on different nodes.
> I'd recommend adding a new set of fields for the node load and store
> the information in the same structure used for other node information
> (slurmd_config) then add a new function to
> src/slurmd/slurmd/get_mach_stat.c to collect the info. If you do work
> on this, please send your work to the mailing list and we can
> incorporate it into the main code base.
>
> Quoting Michael Gutteridge <[email protected]>:
>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Does slurm report system load information (c.f. /proc/loadavg,
>> uptime(1))?  I'd like to report that up to Moab, but I can't seem to
>> suss out where slurm has that information.
>>
>> It doesn't look like it reports CPULOAD via wiki2, so that's going to
>> need modification.  I can't locate anything in slurmd's source that
>> suggests slurmd gathers that data.  If it's something I'll have to
>> write, would using something a'la the ifdef'd "USE_CPU_SPEED" work?
>> (that's in src/slurmd/slurmd/get_mach_stat.c)
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Michael
>



-- 
Hey! Somebody punched the foley guy!
   - Crow, MST3K ep. 508

Reply via email to