"Mark A. Grondona" <mgrond...@llnl.gov> writes: > Hm, that doesn't seem to agree with the documentation, so I would > assume that is a bug.
Yes, especially since ConstrainSwapSpace seems to constrain RAM+swap according to the documentation. > Either the docs or the code should be updated. > Anyhow, if you'd like to allow jobs to use a greater amount of > memory+swap, for now you could increase AllowedSwapSpace to something > like 50 (which would mean that memory+swap would be 50% larger than > memory alone) Thanks for the tip. > Ok, I have added an "example" lua plugin to the slurm-spank-plugins > project on google code called oom-detect.lua. You can browse the > code here: Thanks! -- Cheers, Bjørn-Helge Mevik, dr. scient, Research Computing Services, University of Oslo
