Ok, thank you !
Yes it's 2.3.3, we need to upgrade :-).

Regards,
Benoit


2013/5/21 Danny Auble <[email protected]>

> This is known and fixed in more recent versions. I am guessing you mean
> you are running 2.3 not 3.3 :).
>
>
> Benoit Boccard <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We've noted a strange behaviour when we have special characters (like ^M
>> or other invisible characters) :
>> the db seems to be corrupted, but it's only the display, because these
>> characters are stored in the db.
>>
>> For example :
>>
>>        JobID    JobName    UID        QOS  Partition  AllocCPUS
>> NCPUS   NNodes        NodeList              Submit      State ExitCode
>> ------------ ---------- ------ ---------- ---------- ----------
>> ---------- -------- --------------- ------------------- ---------- --------
>> 987526               2    1245  seq_court    compute          1
>> 1        1           cn026 2013-03-15T15:27:13  COMPLETED      0:0
>>        JobID    JobName    UID        QOS  Partition  AllocCPUS
>> NCPUS   NNodes        NodeList              Submit      State ExitCode
>> ------------ ---------- ------ ---------- ---------- ----------
>> ---------- -------- --------------- ------------------- ---------- --------
>> 987541             *°Ïw *   1245  seq_court Fefs/Zj47+
>> 1          1        1            *°Ù¯* 2013-03-15T15:27:13
>> COMPLETED      0:0
>>        JobID    JobName    UID        QOS  Partition  AllocCPUS
>> NCPUS   NNodes        NodeList              Submit      State ExitCode
>> ------------ ---------- ------ ---------- ---------- ----------
>> ---------- -------- --------------- ------------------- ---------- --------
>> 987569             *PäO*    1245  seq_court        ^|
>> 1          1        1   None assigned 2013-03-15T15:27:14  COMPLETED
>> 0:0
>>        JobID    JobName    UID        QOS  Partition  AllocCPUS
>> NCPUS   NNodes        NodeList              Submit      State ExitCode
>>
>> Do you know if there is a workaround (except educate our users, we're
>> doing the maximum for that :-)), or or if there is a bugfix (we use slurm
>> 3.3, pretty old version).
>>
>> Thank you !
>>
>> Regards,
>> Benoit Boccard
>>
>

Reply via email to