[slurm-dev] Re: Killing the backfill...

Tue, 20 May 2014 06:04:29 -0700 

On 2014-05-20 14:54, Tommi T wrote:



On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 1:51 PM, Magnus Jonsson <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi!

While investigating an other matter I found that if you have lots of
jobs running with short job steps they killing the backfill very effective.


Hi,

Do you use bf_continue-flag?

http://slurm.schedmd.com/sched_config.html



Yes and no. I implemented the first version of bf_continue but it was 
while debugging some strange behaviour of bf_continue I started looking 
more into what exactly caused the last_job_update to be updated all the 
time.


I will return with more information about my bf_continue-findings.

/Magnus

--
Magnus Jonsson, Developer, HPC2N, Umeå Universitet




Attachment:
smime.p7s

Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature






















					Reply via email to