Dear Aaaron,
thanks a lot, I can pick up some logging on Friday morning. The stuff is
in school.
Cheerio,
Luis
On 2/18/15 1:28 PM, Aaron Knister wrote:
Hi Luis,
That's surprising to me. Can you send any errors you got when the x86_64
controller was talking to the ARM compute nodes? I'm wondering if there's a
field in one of the SLURN binary protocol structures whose length is
architecture dependent. From what I gather ARM is little endian so I don't
*think* it's an endianness issue.
Thanks,
Aaron
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 18, 2015, at 3:16 AM, Luis Kornblueh <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hello,
I try to use slurm on a cluster buid by school kids. The controller
daemon (slurmctld) runs on a x86_64 box with Debian wheezy and the
associated Debian package. The compute nodes are ARM based running
as well Debian wheezy (slurmd). It seems that the slurmctld and slurmd cannot
communicate which other. If I move the controller to an arm
platform everything works fine. For cross testing I added a x86_64
box as compute node and that one could communicate with the x86_64
base controller.
This allows to assume, I think, that there is some trouble with the
communication protocol as it is not architecture/hardware independent.
Could you give me any help on how to deal with this?
Thanks a lot,
Luis
--
\\\\\\
(-0^0-)
--------------------------oOO--(_)--OOo-----------------------------
Luis Kornblueh Tel. : +49-40-41173289
Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology Fax. : +49-40-41173298
Bundesstr. 53
D-20146 Hamburg Email: [email protected]
Federal Republic of Germany
--
\\\\\\
(-0^0-)
--------------------------oOO--(_)--OOo-----------------------------
Luis Kornblueh Tel. : +49-40-41173289
Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology Fax. : +49-40-41173298
Bundesstr. 53
D-20146 Hamburg Email: [email protected]
Federal Republic of Germany
