Hi Chris, On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Christopher Samuel <[email protected]> wrote: > We're looking at seeing if we can combine fair share with our existing > quota system that uses GrpCPUMins. > > However, for fair share a decay factor is strongly suggested and I worry > that there is an implication that the usage that GrpCPUMins compares > against would decline and so allow a project to run jobs after having > already hit their cap. > > Is that true?
I'd be very interested to know about this too. We (Stanford Research Computing) have a use case where we need to make fairshare and CPU.minutes hard limits co-exist on the same cluster for different user communities. Cheers, -- Kilian
