On 2016-05-17 12:19, Loris Bennett wrote:
> 
> Benjamin Redling
> <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>> On 05/17/2016 10:02, Loris Bennett wrote:
>>>
>>> Benjamin Redling
>>> <[email protected]> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 2016-05-13 05:58, Husen R wrote:
[...]
>>> Which version does this? 
[...]
>> An older one. [...]
>> I assumed slurm commands/parameters don't change (all over the board).
[...]
> I haven't really been bitten by such changes.  My main gripe with the
> Slurm tools is the inconsistency of the interfaces, e.g. output columns:
> 
>   squeue -o " %.18i"
>   sacct -o jobid%18
> 
> or selection according to nodes
> 
>   squeue -w node001
>   sacct -N node001
> 
> This is obviously not a real problem, but it is a daily annoyance.  So
> in that sense, I do think that changing the parameter semantics would be
> a good idea, but only once and only if the options become harmonised
> across all the tools!

I agree. That would be a good reason -- if prominently advertised in the
changelog and highlighted in the documentation.
I wrote it before: I miss an easy way to lookup the documentation for a
specific slurm version on the official site. Like ganeti does it.

Regards,
Benjamin
-- 
FSU Jena | JULIELab.de/Staff/Benjamin+Redling.html
vox: +49 3641 9 44323 | fax: +49 3641 9 44321

Reply via email to