I've had consistent success with the documented system - "rpmbulid
slurm-<release>.tgz" then yum installing the resulting files, using 15.x,
16.05 and 17.02.
Have on occasion needed to recompile - hdf5 support and for non main line
plugins, but otherwise it's been pretty easy.
Will happily support/debug your efforts, and have used Ole's useful notes
I'm a Centos 7.2 user atm, would happily get from epel or copr.
The most dangerous phrase in the language is, "We've always done it this
- Grace Hopper
On 17 October 2016 at 19:19, Adrian Sevcenco <
> On 10/17/2016 10:46 AM, Andrew Elwell wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > I see from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566 that
> > there have been a few unsuccessful attempts to get slurm into fedora
> > (and potentially EPEL)
> > Is anyone on this list actively working on it at the moment? I'll
> > update the bugzilla ticket to prod the last portential packager but
> > failing that I'm offering to work on it.
> > My plan is to get 16.05 into fedora, but not into EPEL itself (the
> > supported life of a given release is just too short to match with the
> > RHEL timeline), however I'll probably put "unofficial" srpms publicly
> > available that shoud meet all the epel packaging requirements.
> > schedmd people - as some of this may involve patches to the spec file
> > amongst other things, what's the best way to progress this - attach a
> > diff to something on your bugzilla page rather than git pull req?
> Just recently i succeed to build and run successfully 16.05.5 on fedora 23
> and i had to use patches from :
> (well i succeeded locally as in my copr repo i still have problem with f23
> and f24
> but i don't know why)
> it would seem that these problems on fedora (with the hardened build) are
> but so far no work towards solving (nor workarounds implementation) was
> done ..