Have you followed my Wiki for installing Slurm on CentOS 7?
This has worked for us: https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/niflheim/SLURM

If your problems are caused by your network setup, then it's almost impossible for external people to help you...

/Ole

On 07/06/2017 11:38 AM, Said Mohamed Said wrote:
Even after reinstalling everything from the beginning the problem is still there. Right now I am out of Ideas.




Best Regards,


Said.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Said Mohamed Said
*Sent:* Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:23:05 PM
*To:* slurm-dev
*Subject:* Re: [slurm-dev] Re: SLURM ERROR! NEED HELP

Thank you all for your suggestions, the only thing I can do for now is to uninstall and install from the beginning and I will use the most recent version of slurm on both nodes.

For Felix who asked, the OS is CentOS 7.3 on both machines.

I will let you know if that can solve the issue.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Rajul Kumar <[email protected]>
*Sent:* Thursday, July 6, 2017 12:41:51 AM
*To:* slurm-dev
*Subject:* [slurm-dev] Re: SLURM ERROR! NEED HELP
Sorry for the typo
It's generally when one of the controller or compute can reach the other one but it's *not* happening vice-versa.


On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rajul Kumar <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I came across the same problem sometime back. It's generally when
    one of the controller or compute can reach to other one but it's
    happening vice-versa.

    Have a look at the following points:
    - controller and compute can ping to each other
    - both share the same slurm.conf
    - slurm.conf has the location of both controller and compute
    - slurm services are running on the compute node when the controller
    says it's down
    - TCP connections are not being dropped
    - Ports are accessible that are to be used for communication,
    specifically response ports
    - Check the routing rules if any
    - Clocks are synced across
    - Hope there isn't any version mismatch but still have a look
    (doesn't recognize the nodes for major version differences)

    Hope this helps.

    Best,
    Rajul

    On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 10:52 AM, John Hearns <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Said,
            a problem like this always has a simple cause. We share your
        frustration, and several people her have offered help.
        So please do not get discouraged. We have all been in your
        situation!

        The only way to handle problems like this is
        a) start at the beginning and read the manuals and webpages closely
        b) start at the lowest level, ie here the network and do NOT
        assume that any component is working
        c) look at all the log files closely
        d) start daeomon sprocesses in a terminal with any 'verbose'
        flags set
        e) then start on more low-level diagnostics, such as tcpdump of
        network adapters and straces of the processes and gstacks


        you have been doing steps a b and c very well
        I suggest staying with these - I myself am going for Adam
        Huffmans suggestion of the NTP clock times.
        Are you SURE that on all nodes you have run the 'date' command
        and also 'ntpq -p'
        Are you SURE the master node and the node OBU-N6   are both
        connecting to an NTP server?   ntpq -p will tell you that


        And do not lose heart.  This is how we all learn.

















        On 5 July 2017 at 16:23, Said Mohamed Said <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            Sinfo -R gives "NODE IS NOT RESPONDING"
            ping gives successful results from both nodes

            I really can not figure out what is causing the problem.

            Regards,
            Said
            
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            *From:* Felix Willenborg <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>>
            *Sent:* Wednesday, July 5, 2017 9:07:05 PM

            *To:* slurm-dev
            *Subject:* [slurm-dev] Re: SLURM ERROR! NEED HELP
            When the nodes change to the down state, what is 'sinfo -R'
            saying? Sometimes it gives you a reason for that.

            Best,
            Felix

            Am 05.07.2017 um 13:16 schrieb Said Mohamed Said:
            Thank you Adam, For NTP I did that as well before posting
            but didn't fix the issue.

            Regards,
            Said
            
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            *From:* Adam Huffman <[email protected]>
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            *Sent:* Wednesday, July 5, 2017 8:11:03 PM
            *To:* slurm-dev
            *Subject:* [slurm-dev] Re: SLURM ERROR! NEED HELP

            I've seen something similar when node clocks were skewed.

            Worth checking that NTP is running and they're all
            synchronised.

            On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Said Mohamed Said
            <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
            > Thank you all for suggestions. I turned off firewall on both 
machines but
            > still no luck. I can confirm that No managed switch is preventing 
the nodes
            > from communicating. If you check the log file, there is 
communication for
            > about 4mins and then the node state goes down.
            > Any other idea?
            > ________________________________
            > From: Ole Holm Nielsen <[email protected]>
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            > Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 7:07:15 PM
            > To: slurm-dev
            > Subject: [slurm-dev] Re: SLURM ERROR! NEED HELP
            >
            >
            > On 07/05/2017 11:40 AM, Felix Willenborg wrote:
            >> in my network I encountered that managed switches were preventing
            >> necessary network communication between the nodes, on which SLURM
            >> relies. You should check if you're using managed switches to 
connect
            >> nodes to the network and if so, if they're blocking 
communication on
            >> slurm ports.
            >
            > Managed switches should permit IP layer 2 traffic just like 
unmanaged
            > switches!  We only have managed Ethernet switches, and they work 
without
            > problems.
            >
            > Perhaps you meant that Ethernet switches may perform some firewall
            > functions by themselves?
            >
            > Firewalls must be off between Slurm compute nodes as well as the
            > controller host.  See
            > 
https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/niflheim/Slurm_configuration#configure-firewall-for-slurm-daemons
            
<https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/niflheim/Slurm_configuration#configure-firewall-for-slurm-daemons>
            >
            > /Ole

Reply via email to