Yes. I have a discussion here which might be useful:
https://docs.rc.fas.harvard.edu/kb/fairshare/
Note this is using the classic fairshare not FairTree which is now the
default for Slurm.
-Paul Edmon-
On 6/25/2020 9:23 AM, Durai Arasan wrote:
Hi,
In slurm accounting there is the parameter "fairshare" that is
arbitrarily set by the administrator for associations using sacctmgr.
And there is the factor "fair-share" in slurm priority, which is not
set by the administrator but calculated from the amount of resources
used and the resources promised (correct me if I am wrong).
Unfortunately both these concepts are used to determine priority and
so it confuses me.
Are these two concepts different?
Thanks,
Durai Arasan
Zentrum für Datenverarbeitung
Tübingen
