That interface never looked to impressive and kinda a lot to dump on a hardware package when I don't know how it fully functions.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hrusovszky, T-Net [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 8:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are multiple bandwidth solutions out there -- there are also multiple
boxes that do a lot more than just bandwidth as well. For $1995.00, it's
hard to find anything that can secure a network as well as the T.U.N.A
(The Ultimate Network Appliance) can without 'rolling your own'.
... At 05:38 PM 6/17/2003 -0600, you wrote:
>I personally really like the Band Width Arbitrator. It is a plug an play
>system. But you don't have the fancy screens and stuff but I also know it
>is doing it's job. I would really check into this open source
>solution. They are working on making it better around the clock.
>
>Tim
>
>At 10:51 AM 6/17/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>Quality cost money but that's got to be A LOT of quality because I saw
>>the prices on these once and they were pretty high dollar.
>>
>>
>>
>>Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>----------
>>From: Jason Keller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 9:53 AM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>>I tell you what guys I think that no one still does bandwidth shaping as
>>good as Net enforcer. I have tried both systems Microtik and Net enforcer
>>and I think the Net enforcer does a better job. It allows you to see what
>>your clients are using. What protocols with out knowing this, yes you can
>>eliminate the kazza, imesh, limewire, and others but what about the other
>>protocols that they will come up with and are using currently without
>>being able to graph and monitor it is very difficult to regulate. I know
>>its more money, but sometimes quality costs money. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Koskenmaki
>>Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 6:33 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Shaping
>>
>>
>>
>>There's no need for them to learn CLI operation.
>>
>>
>>
>>Pretty much everything of use in Star-OS operates from an ANSI menu system.
>>
>>
>>
>>It's not X or windows, but not obscure CLI operations, either, and
>>certainly hasn't hte overhead that running a gui would.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>NEOFAST.NET
>>North
>>East
>>Oregon
>>FAST
>>Net
>>mark(at)neofast.net
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>
>>From: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>phantam
>>
>>To: <mailto:'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'>'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>>
>>Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:18 AM
>>
>>Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Shaping
>>
>>
>>
>>Doesn't that water tight coupler look familiar LOL, Ye I might jkust get
>>the software then thanks dude, as for staros and mikrotik, its too hard
>>to work with I don't want to have to teach my techs the cli commands
>>right now there incompetent as it is
>>
>>
>>
>>Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>---
>>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>>Checked by AVG anti-virus system
>>(<http://www.grisoft.com>http://www.grisoft.com).
>>Version: 6.0.489 / Virus Database: 288 - Release Date: 6/10/03
>
>
>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
>smartBridges <yournickname>
>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
>smartBridges)
>Archives: http://198.63.203.6
The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://198.63.203.6
