Wouldn't turning down the power increase hidden node issues?  If you have a
close in shot and crank the power levels down then wouldn't your distant
shots have problems seeing the close in clients?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 8:39 AM
Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Power Management


>    My 2 cents worth...
> When you have the power up more than needed you are also turning the noise
> up, similar to over modulation that CB (citizen band radio) operators like
> to do sounds real bad. Not identicle in theory but the best way I can
> describe it without showing it first hand. I would only adjust power on
> clients though since the AP is servicing many different situations all at
> the same time.
>    Joe
> RiverNet
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brian Winters
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 12:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Power Management
>
>
> Really? That's an interesting point I hadn't really thought of. So do
> you turn down the power until you reach certain signal strength? If so,
> what is that strength? We have several links where we put up our
> standard antenna and have 100% signal. I am sure that we could probably
> turn down the power and either remain at 100 or maybe drop to 95% or
> something. Im interested in why this would allow better throughput tho.
> Is there any technical reason that I am too stupid to understand or is
> it just "PFM"?
>
> -Brian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Petermann
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 1:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [smartBridges] Power Management
>
> Are any of you managing your power levels?
>
> What I mean is are you turning down the power on your close shots or are
>
> you setting everything
> to 30 dBm?
>
> The reason I ask is I recently turned down the power on a few links (set
> up
> before I was hired)
> and improved thru put and packet loss dropped.
>
> Dan Petermann
> Wyoming.com
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
>
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to