If I recall, the cost of the Airpoint indoor and Outdoor are about the same.
Scott -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 12:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Question about new aP firmware coming out soon. They will be outdoor in a NEMA box. That is why disabling of communication between clients is needed. As I mentioned, the cost of an aPPO coupled with the un-availability of them, forces me to go this route. If the rated specs on the data sheet for the aP is correct, then the climate where I live is within range for operating temps and this approach will work just fine. That is my application. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 12:29 PM Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Question about new aP firmware coming out soon. I mean you no offense, but why would you need to disable communications amongst clients at the same location? I assume you are using these as indoor access points for businesses/homes. I have never heard of a requirement like this. Maybe we are missing something here. What is your application? Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 3:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Question about new aP firmware coming out > soon. > > > No, I am talking about the access point. The aP will be used as an > access point that's why the ability should be there to disable > client-to-client communication. Cost and availability of the aPPO > prevent me from using them (I'm small peanuts). > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 12:08 PM > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Question about new aP firmware > coming out soon. > > > I think you only need to disable the client to client communications > from the access point. This setting does not make a difference on the > airPoint on the client end... Is this what you are talking about? > > Correct me if I am wrong. > > Jason > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 3:00 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Question about new aP firmware > coming out > > soon. > > > > > > I'm REALLY sorry to hear that. May I ask why something so > simple to > > implement and widely requested/needed would not be added? > Is it more > > of an effort to force people to upgrade to the aPP or aPPO for that > > kind of capability? Since the aPPOs are so hard to come by, I'm > > forced to use the aP to get customers up and running (if I want to > > stick with sB anyway). However, I will probably have to rethink my > > plan since something so simple to implement will not be > added to the > > FW. > > > > Dissappointed, > > Scott > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "sB Tech Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 11:45 AM > > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Question about new aP firmware coming > > out soon. > > > > > > This must be everyone wish but unfortunately it won't have > the feature > > to disable client to client communication. There is no plan > to have it > > on airPoint Indoor. The new firmware that is going to > release is for > > resolving the thermal issue. > > > > Alex > > sB Tech Support > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Scott > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:54 AM > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: [smartBridges] Question about new aP firmware coming out > > soon. > > > > Will the new firmware version support disabling client-to-client > > communication? That's about the only thing I can think of that I > > would really like to see in the new aP firmware. > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
