RE: [smartBridges] Conduit a good idea?

[beckman]

I have also placed foil HVAC tape around the ABo to increase its shielding. I ALWAYS do this with WET11, as they die if you get static within a mile of them... :)

Less than $0.15 and 5 min, If you want a shielded ABo this is the way to go. Also, if you are doing a short run of Cat5 outside, use this type of tape to shield it (along your mast, keeps it out of site and provides shielding too), then use 1/2" flexible metallic conduit to finish the run inside. Removes having to screw with STP.

 

 -----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of beckman
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Conduit a good idea?

Ive had a few 'problem' locations solved by placing the CAT5 in a flexible metallic conduit (you know, the type that is a helix coiled?).

 

Also, be sure to place a LPD on the coax port and to properly ground everything...

 

As for Radax, use plastic on other non-metallic conduit.

 

 -----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kevin Proctor
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 2:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Conduit a good idea?

I don't know of any places around here that require it for residential installs, but most of the buildings we put distributed antenna systems in required conduit for low voltage.  Now, just try and convince an electrical inspector that leaky coax can NOT be put in conduit or you defeat the whole purpose of having the leaky coax in the first place!  (I can see it now.  700 questions about leaky coax.  :-) )  Yes, it could have applications for wireless broadband.

Kevin

Bobby Bounds wrote:

Thank You, Kevin for the comments and the reassurances. Yes, it is costly and time consuming.....so are the alternatives to not doing it. Your comment about meeting code is a good one. Had not thought of that. Looks like its' gonna be conduit city from here on out. <ughhh>

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Proctor
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Conduit a good idea?

Bobby,

I'll talk about it.  It's a great idea.  The only problem is that it is going to take a lot more time on the average install.  Some business codes may actually require it, even though we are low voltage.  There are some municipalities around Denver that do require it, even for low voltage.  It certainly cures the shielding problem. :)  AND it looks professional as all get out.

Kevin

Bobby Bounds wrote:

No one wants to talk about using conduit today it seems! Are we in denial? See the earlier post for the arguments for using conduit on CPE installs. Feedback much appreciated.

 

Bobby Bounds

Airwave Internet, LLC

 

 

-- 
Kevin B. Proctor
Customer Service
Internet Sales
Electro-Comm Distributing Inc.
5015 Paris St.
Denver, CO 80239
+1-800-525-0173
+1-303-371-8182
+1-303-371-8158 FAX
+1-800-423-8018 FAX
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


    

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org

-- 
Kevin B. Proctor
Customer Service
Internet Sales
Electro-Comm Distributing Inc.
5015 Paris St.
Denver, CO 80239
+1-800-525-0173
+1-303-371-8182
+1-303-371-8158 FAX
+1-800-423-8018 FAX
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org