MMMMM....your right. I did this analysis via Electrocomm's site. Think the SimpleNMS is lying. (others have pointed this out)
Earl - UpHi.net

Wireless Network Link Analysis Results

[link view]

 Highest transmitted frequency : 2483.000 MHz (2.483 GHz) 
                    Wavelength : 4.753 inches (12.074 centimeters) 
   Transmitter RF power output : 20.000 dBm (100.000 milliwatts) 

            Transmit cable type : Times Microwave LMR-600
          Transmit cable length : 1.000 feet (0.305 meters)
      Total transmit cable loss : 0.044 dB (0.044 dB/foot 0.145 dB/meter) 
  Total transmit connector loss : 0.500 dB through 2 connectors 
      Total transmit cable loss : 0.544 dB 
  Transmit miscellaneous losses : 1.000 dB 

Transmit antenna peak gain : 2.2 dBi RF input power to the antenna : 19.456 dBm (88.227 milliwatts) Allowed input power to antenna : 30.000 dBm (1000.000 milliwatts)   Per FCC Part 15 rules Transmit antenna height : 60.000 feet (18.288 meters) Distance to the radio horizon : 10.629 miles (17.106 kilometers)

             Receive cable type : Times Microwave LMR-400
           Receive cable length : 1.000 feet (0.305 meters)
       Total receive cable loss : 0.067 dB (0.067 dB/foot 0.221 dB/meter) 
   Total receive connector loss : 0.500 dB through 2 connectors 
       Total receive cable loss : 0.567 dB 
   Receive miscellaneous losses : 1.000 dB 

Receive antenna peak gain : 15 dBi Receive antenna height : 60.000 feet (18.288 meters) Distance to the radio horizon : 10.629 miles (17.106 kilometers)

           Received power level : -34.941 dBm (4003.316 �V) 
           Receiver's threshold : -82.000 dBm (17.762 �V) 
            Thermal fade margin : 47.059 dB    Just down the block, Huh.
          Probability of outage : 0.001 % 
     Total free space path loss : 70.030 dBi over a path length of 0.019 miles (0.030 kilometers) 
          Peak transmitted EIRP : 20.656 dBm (116.303 mW)  

           Midpoint 0.6 Fresnel zone boundary : 2.437 feet (0.743 meters)
   Maximum space wave communications distance : 21.258 miles (34.212 kilometers) 

  • Radio horizon data is for 4/3 Earth, k = 1.33.
  • All cables, antennas, connectors, and adapters have a 50 ohm impedance.
  • Receive and threshold voltages are for a 50 ohm load impedance and don't take into account the receiver's bandwidth or temperature.
  • Horizontal polarization will generally provide less multipath in urban areas and may provide lower path loss in non line-of-sight situations.
  • Attenuation from trees is approximately 0.35 dB/meter at 2.4 GHz.  At lower frequencies, the attenuation is somewhat lower for horizontal polarization than for vertical, but the difference disappears above about 1 GHz.
  • Attenuation of a 2.4 GHz signal in heavy rain (150 mm/hr) is 0.02 dB/km.
  • Assumes 0.25 dB loss for each coax connector or adapter.
  • Use as much antenna gain as possible, and get your antenna as high as possible.
  • Maximum space wave communications distance is the longest distance possible using the choosen antenna heights.  It does not mean a link that long is possible.
  • Try to obtain a thermal fade margin of 20 dB, or larger, for a more reliable link.  If the fade margin is negative, that link is impossible.

Calculated on Thu Aug 28 16:25:55 2003 GMT

 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:50:11 AM
Subject: Re[4]: [smartBridges] SimpleNMS UPDATE Please
 
Earl,
 
900+ -> 100 ft(31m),Tx_20dBm,Ant_2.2dbi
SB API -> Ant_15dbi
 
Theoretically MAX_from_900+ :
Rx_SB_API = -100 -20Log(0.031) +2.2 +20 +15 = -33dBm
 
Practically MAX_from_900+ :
Rx_SB_API = -48 dBm
 
 
However not -10 dBm ;)
 
-Ivan
 
ANNOUNCEMENT
WISPCON IV - Can You Ping Me Now? Good!
October 27-29, 2003 - Dallas Texas
 
WISP 101 Boot Camp
September 29-October 3, 2003 - Chicago, Illinois
 
The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
.
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here

Reply via email to