Hello David,

Ah!

I wondered if it was doing that. So the wireless is acting just like a simple 
hub arangement, not like a switch which knows which port to send the data on. 
I will try replacing my hub with a cheap 10/100 switch and see what effect 
that has. These days the 10Mb hubs that used to be sold have been superseeded 
by 10/100 switches. As far as I know, these are smart enough to know which 
MAC addresses are on which socket.

I don't want to go all out for a router as this requires configuration.

Thanks for your help.

Regards,
Wayland.


On Friday 10 Oct 2003 11:43 am, David Moss wrote:
> Wayland,
>
> David Moss here... The wireless kit and a hub are all layer 2 - they pass
> all traffic with no regard for where it is destined for.  The recieving
> computer simply says "o those packets that I can see / hear are for me -
> i'll do something with them"...  The other computers say "those packets are
> nothing to do with me - i'll ignore them and wait for them to finish before
> I try and send" - Something like that.  You should put a router between
> your own network and your wireless network - this will eliminate the
> problem.
>
> If you need any help let me know. I have a multinode service in East
> Cambridgeshire.
>
> David
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wayland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 11:31 AM
> Subject: [smartBridges] Local traffic swamping with hub (MRTG)
>
> > I suppose this is probably obvious but it suprized me. We have just
> > installed the MRTG traffic graphic web page on our Linux box. This was
> > producing meaningfull graphs of Internet use per customer until I copied
> > a CD from one local PC to another. My graph went through the roof! The
>
> stange
>
> > this was that this was not between to wireless connected nodes but
> > through
>
> a
>
> > hub and cat 5 cable. My airBridge registered massive network traffic,
>
> which
>
> > ofcourse was present on my wired network. My question is does this local
> > traffic get transmitted wirelessly? Wireless connected hosts were almost
> > impossible to reach whilst the 600MB transfer was taking place.
> >
> > What is your experience with this issue?
> >
> > airBridge----hub---=local pcs
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wayland.
> >
> >
> > Can't get ADSL? Then sign up with www.countybroadband.co.uk
> >
> >
> > ----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
> > Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
> > http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm
> >
> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
>
> smartBridges <yournickname>
>
> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
>
> smartBridges)
>
> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
> ----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
> Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
> http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the
> body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org

----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to