Hello.

We have found that if a cpe is "over powered" then the other users will
suffer less throughput - try turning the power down, if you can, so that the
rssi isn't proportionately a lot stronger than your other users.   The rts
is only effective over a small band of signal difference, say about 4 - 5db.

Regards

David
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Del Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 1:04 PM
Subject: FW: [smartBridges] one user affecting traffic


> Scott,
> The lowest link qual that the APPO sees for the clients is about 60%, most
> of the link qualities shown on the APPO are 75 - 90%.  Looking at the
> statistics tabs on the APPO, shows 360 failed packets, 16 aged packets,
and
> zero retries, on the wireless side.  It shows no errors on the Ethernet
side
> of the APPO and 16,000 singledefered packets. It has been about 10 days
> since the counters were reset on the APPO.
>
> We have all of the ABT radios set for auto fallback on the rate setting
and
> the APPO set for auto fallback also with all of the rates selected (11,
5.5,
> 2, & 1 Mbps).
>
> I'm not certain what you mean about the rate negotiation in the last
> sentence of your reply.
> Kind regards,
> Del
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 2:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Del Thompson
> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] one user affecting traffic
>
>
> Del,
>
> I have noticed this problem (and I run a Cisco AP).  It isn't a problem
> but ht e nature of the beast (maybe).  What link quality does your APPO
> see for the ABTs?  What we have noticed is that the ABT's see the towers
> much better than the Towers see the ABT's.  And in actuality, we
> actually see large re-try counts (no, lowering frag has not helped) and
> we also believe that the radio's are actually talking at 1 MBps up, and
> therefore usable bandwidth is much smaller (600kbps?..  ) and with the
> retries, one customer allowed at 256 can eat-up all that 600 kbps pretty
> fast...
>
> Btw.. Save me some reading time.. in the rate negotiation, do the systems
> negotiate well both ways (i.e. Client to AP is as controlling in rate
> setting as AP to client?)
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Del Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:36:23 -0500
> Subject: [smartBridges] one user affecting traffic
>
> > Hello all,
> > I have the following setup:
> > ISP >> router >> backhaul >> router >> Mikrotic (bandwidth control
> > unit) >>
> > APPO >> ABT
> >
> > This particular APPO has 30 customers all using the ABT's.
> >
> > All customers are bandwidth limited at the tower site by the MiKrotic,
> > most
> > customers are 256Kbps down, 128Kbps up.  The maximum bandwidth
> > purchased on
> > this APPO is 512kbps/512Kbps.
> >
> > The problem I've noticed is if a particular customer is doing a
> > download
> > that lasts several minutes, every other user on that access point sees
> > a
> > severe degradation in service.  The other customers on that AP see
> > download
> > speeds drop to about 128Kbps and uploads drop to about 64Kbps.  In
> > other
> > words, they see a decrease to about 1/2 of what they should have.
> >
> > We tried setting the RTS threshold on the ABT's to 500 and this had no
> > noticable effect. (APPO RTS & Fragmentation left as default setting)
> > Then we lowered the RTS threshold to 256 on all of the ABT's, again,
> > this
> > had no noticable effect.
> > We have not set the fragmentation threshold on any of our radios.
> >
> > We started noticing this phenomena when the number of associated radios
> > on
> > the APPO reached 20.
> >
> > My question is, has anyone else seen this behavior and is there a fix?
> >
> > APPO firmware is 1.4j.8, ABT firmware is 0.01.07
> >
> > Thank you in advance for any feedback.
> > Del
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
> > Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
> > http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm
> >
> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> > smartBridges)
> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> ----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
> Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
> http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>

----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to