>> well, that looks like the problem: whoever logs in first and starts 
>> the process wins.

Do you mean that you are login in into two accounts in the same machine and 
starting a daemon in each of the accounts at the same time on the same port?

One machine, 1 port. You cannot have two daemon running in the same port in the 
same machine. It does not matter if they are in different accounts. 

If you need a daemon per account then you could have the second daemon joining 
the first one, but only one will be the root daemon. Is this what you are 
trying to do, one daemon per account?

Thanks and best regards,

Julio Guijarro


-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 07 December 2010 17:02
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Smartfrog-users] "Port already in use" exception when starting 
SmartFrog

On 07/12/10 13:17, [email protected] wrote:
>> On 07/12/10 10:48, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>   >  We checked the port and checked for running SmartFrog processes, 
>> but found nothing. The problem manifests itself with one particular 
>> Windows Server 2008 account. We even had two users log in at the same 
>> time and take turns trying to launch SmartFrog. One always succeeded, 
>> while the other always failed.
>>
>> well, that looks like the problem: whoever logs in first and starts 
>> the process wins.
>
> No, that wasn't the case. One user could start SF repeatedly, at any time, 
> while the other (the one with the problem account) could not start it at any 
> time.
>
> There is a way to start SF on a different port, it can be set in 
> default.ini
>>
>> org.smartfrog.sfcore.processcompound.sfRootLocatorPort=3800
>>
>> if the other user gets a different port, there's no conflict on what 
>> is a system wide resource.
>
> We tried changing the port number, to no avail.

>
> I have googled this issue, but didn't find anything specific to this 
> situation. However, it seems that this "port in use" error can in some cases 
> be misleading, indicating some other problem, such as a firewall issue.
>

That's interesting. "Connection Refused" I associate with firewalls, but Port 
in Use usually means something is there. If you get it, try telnet-ing to the 
port and seeing what's there, and try netstat -a -p to see what's on the port 
-that's my usual first step in tracking down port use problems.

-steve


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly 
upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move off 
Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build, use, 
and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus Notes 
Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d
_______________________________________________
Smartfrog-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartfrog-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly 
upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move
off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build,
use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus 
Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d
_______________________________________________
Smartfrog-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartfrog-users

Reply via email to