That's a minor problem compared to the fact that the compiler seems "broken" in C++11 mode ;-)
Cheers, Trond On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 4:50 PM Filip Hajny <[email protected]> wrote: > > 16. 6. 2015 v 16:47, Robert Mustacchi <[email protected]>: > > > > On 6/15/15 23:55 , Trond Norbye wrote: > >>> > >>> I started to try and duplicate this today before finding myself down > the > >>> rabbit hole that > >>> gcc49-4.9.2nb1, at least in base-64-lts 14.4.2 and base-64 15.1.1, > >>> doesn't install the gcc or g++ executables. Is that expected? > >>> > >> > >> They do get installed, just not where you'd expect them ;-) you'll find > >> them in /opt/local/gcc49/bin ;-) > > > > If the pkg_alternatives package is not installed, then they won't have > > links in /opt/local/bin. Was it? > > Known bug, we have only added the alternatives definitions for gcc47 > locally in the (long) past. It’s missing from gcc49. We should fix that > shortly. That’s just the PATH issue though. > > -F > > > > ------------------------------------------- > smartos-discuss > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now > RSS Feed: > https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/21483210-0c8a6114 > Modify Your Subscription: > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > ------------------------------------------- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
