I'll check what the behaviour is on the working VM tomorrow. I'm not able to 
confirm that this isn't just a symptom of the system diagnostics.


-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] VLAN tagging to guest zone

Time (UTC): August 27 2015 6:11 pm

From: [email protected]

To: [email protected]

CC: [email protected]



I've just checked and yes I do. I see it leave with VLAN ID applied but 
received with the VLAN stripped from the frame.


-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] VLAN tagging to guest zone

Time (UTC): August 27 2015 5:18 pm

From: [email protected]

To: [email protected]



Do you see the ARP's withing the vm?



On 2015-08-27 19:18, Daryl Turner wrote:



> etherstub.

>

> Funnily enough checking the NICs with snoop it appears the ARP request

> makes it to the destination NIC but obviously isn't being picked up by

> the destination machine.

>

> [root@00-0c-29-87-c9-0b ~]# snoop -z

> a57e5f07-cee7-47ed-a74b-f54b227cd25f -d net0

> Using device net0 (promiscuous mode)

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

> ^C[root@00-0c-29-87-c9-0b ~]# snoop -z

> a57e5f07-cee7-47ed-a74b-f54b227cd25f -d net1

> Using device net1 (promiscuous mode)

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

> VLAN#200: 192.168.0.1 -> (broadcast) ARP C Who is 192.168.0.2,

> 192.168.0.2 ?

>

>> -------- Original Message --------

>> Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] VLAN tagging to guest zone

>> Time (UTC): August 27 2015 4:27 pm

>> From: [email protected]

>> To: [email protected]

>>

>> loop0 is an etherstub or a physical interface?

>>

>> On 2015-08-27 18:25, Daryl Turner wrote:

>>

>>> Here is what i currently have set. This probably wasn't the best

>>> machine to start with as it's already a little unusual.

>>>

>>> This machine is a simulated Juniper router. Net0 loops back into Net1

>>> and each end is placed into logical systems. Multiple links are

>>> simulated by using VLAN tags to create separate point to point

>>> circuits

>>> and allows you to build up a topology of interconnected logical

>>> routers. At the moment tagged frames from net0 aren't received on

>>> net1.

>>> If i use untagged frames I can ping between logical systems as

>>> expected.

>>>

>>> # vmadm get a57e5f07-cee7-47ed-a74b-f54b227cd25f | json nics

>>> [

>>> {

>>> "interface": "net0",

>>> "mac": "f2:da:d4:5c:ba:70",

>>> "nic_tag": "loop0",

>>> "ip": "dhcp",

>>> "model": "e1000",

>>> "allow_ip_spoofing": true,

>>> "allow_mac_spoofing": true,

>>> "allow_restricted_traffic": true,

>>> "allow_unfiltered_promisc": true,

>>> "primary": true

>>> },

>>> {

>>> "interface": "net1",

>>> "mac": "52:fb:a9:db:86:f4",

>>> "nic_tag": "loop0",

>>> "ip": "dhcp",

>>> "model": "e1000",

>>> "allow_ip_spoofing": true,

>>> "allow_mac_spoofing": true,

>>> "allow_restricted_traffic": true,

>>> "allow_unfiltered_promisc": true

>>> }

>>> ]

>>>

>>> I will check the behaviour using separate machines and try using

>>> Joyent

>>> zones to see if it makes any difference.

>>>

>>> Thanks,

>>> Daryl.

>>>

>>>> -------- Original Message --------

>>>> Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] VLAN tagging to guest zone

>>>> Time (UTC): August 27 2015 4:01 pm

>>>> From: [email protected]

>>>> To: [email protected]

>>>> CC: [email protected]

>>>>

>>>> Hi Daryl,

>>>>

>>>> You probably need to have allow_unfiltered_promisc set to true.

>>>>

>>>> I simple add multiple nics with a different vlan_id set for each

>>>> myself,

>>>> which also works fine.

>>>>

>>>> Regards

>>>>

>>>> Jorge

>>>>

>>>> On 2015-08-27 17:31, Daryl Turner wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Hi All,

>>>>>

>>>>> I'm currently working on porting over some machines from a network

>>>>> lab

>>>>> from ESXi to SmartOS. There is a requirement to carry tagged

>>>>> traffic

>>>>> between several KVM branded zones to simulate a specific network

>>>>> topology.

>>>>>

>>>>> From what I can see, and have tried this isn't possible even with

>>>>> the

>>>>> permit_restricted_traffic flag. I've also added spoof_ip and

>>>>> spoof_mac

>>>>> permits.

>>>>>

>>>>> Can anyone confirm if this is a restriction in the virtual

>>>>> networking

>>>>> stack in SmartOS or if there is a possible workaround? The link

>>>>> between

>>>>> the zones is logically point to point so the etherstub wouldn't

>>>>> need

>>>>> to

>>>>> VLAN aware as such, just passing the traffic would satisfy my

>>>>> requirement for now.

>>>>>

>>>>> Thanks,

>>>>> Daryl.

>>>>>

>>>>> SMARTOS-DISCUSS | Archives [1] [2] | Modify [3] Your Subscription

>>>>> [4]

>>>>

>>>> Links:

>>>> ------

>>>> [1] https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now

>>>>

>>>> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/26452851-88b650c7

>>>>

>>>> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;

>>>> http://www.listbox.com

>>>>

>>>

>>> SMARTOS-DISCUSS | Archives [1] [2] | Modify [3] Your Subscription

>>> [4]

>>

>> Links:

>> ------

>> [1] https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now

>>

>> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/26452851-88b650c7

>>

>> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;

>> http://www.listbox.com

>>

>

> SMARTOS-DISCUSS | Archives [1] [2] | Modify [3] Your Subscription

> [4]
 
 
 Links:
 
 ------
 
 [1]  https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now
 
 [2]  https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/26452851-88b650c7
 
 [3] 
 
 https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
 
 [4]  http://www.listbox.com
 



-------------------------------------------
smartos-discuss
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to