Hello,
May I suggest visualizing the pfSense (I assume) firewall. Or adding
another interface to your firewall. The former being my preferred method
(saves energy).

Usama
On Aug 19, 2014 11:47 AM, "G B via smartos-discuss" <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Internet--->cable modem--->PF firewall (physical server)
>                                                     |
>                             physical switch|physical switch
>                                                    / \
>                                                   /   \
>                                         internal  dmz
>                                               /          \
>                                       Windows      \
>                                                            /\
>                                                     mail  web(multiple
> domains each in a Zone)
>
> What I'd like to do since my mail and web servers are in Zones is get rid
> of the physical switch for the dmz and make it a virtual switch.  (sorry
> for the poor ascii art)
>
>
>  On Monday, August 18, 2014 10:09 AM, Robert Mustacchi via smartos-discuss
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/16/2014 09:39 AM, G B via smartos-discuss wrote:
>
> > I'm stumped for the moment, so maybe somebody can alleviate my block.
> >
> > Currently I have a firewall with  dmz and internal interfaces each going
> to a physical switch.  What I'd like to do is removed the dmz physical
> switch and have my dmz servers go through a virtual switch, but that is
> what has me stumped.
> >
> > I created an etherstub:  # dladm create-etherstub vswitch0
> >
> > Then I created a vnic:  # dladm create-vnic -l vswitch0 vnic0
> >
> > Next I intended to plug the CAT6 cable into vnic0, then I would create
> another vnic and put that in a zone.  But:
> >
> > 1)  I'm not sure if that is correct
> > 2)  I'm unsure what the syntax is for the json file for the vnic
> >
> > Another thing is presently the physical nic on the server goes to the
> physical dmz switch.  Not sure what I'd change to eliminate the dmz
> physical switch for the dmz server's physical nic.
>
>
> So, I think it's worth clarifying a few things. While an etherstub is a
> virtual switch, it's a virtual switch that only exists on the host, a
> single vnic can only be created over a single device and therefore
> there's no notion of plugging in a physical cable to a virtual nic. It's
> also the case that every physical device has an implicit virtual switch.
>
> Would it be possible to draw a small network diagram of how you want
> everything to look? It's not really that clear from the mail how you
> want this to look.
>
> Robert
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> smartos-discuss
> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now
> RSS Feed:
> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/24559458-54d8e931
> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>
>
>
>  *smartos-discuss* | Archives
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/24697919-04ed9bf0> |
> Modify
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>
> Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com>
>



-------------------------------------------
smartos-discuss
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to