Thanks for your suggestions. I’ll test the database performance if SSD and SATA are in one pool. On Mar 14, 2016, at 7:39 PM, Fred Liu <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
From: Ian Collins [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 星期日, 三月 13, 2016 4:08 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] How to mount different zfs volumn to the same lx branded zone On 03/12/16 22:49, Fred Liu wrote: It seems hardware pass-through is not applicable in SmartOS from what I know. But there are some indirect methods(NFS/iSCSI) you can try for there is almost no network overhead in LX. What problem are you trying to solve? Have you tried just using one pool and found that option to be inadequate? Don't forget most Linux applications aren't written with ZFS in mind so they suggest all sorts of "performance" tricks we don't have to use. [Fred]: I think the questioner wants to tier the disk performance. That is to say to use ssd to cache and to use sata to store data for database application. Joyent guys have implemented ZFS I/O Throttle. If this feature has greate granularity, using one pool should be the best. Thanks. Fred smartos-discuss | Archives<https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now> [https://www.listbox.com/images/feed-icon-10x10.jpg3e17dd9.jpg?uri=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cubGlzdGJveC5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL2ZlZWQtaWNvbi0xMHgxMC5qcGc] <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/27989153-41c8820b> | Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription [https://www.listbox.com/images/listbox-logo-small.png3e17dd9.png?uri=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cubGlzdGJveC5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL2xpc3Rib3gtbG9nby1zbWFsbC5wbmc] <http://www.listbox.com/> ------------------------------------------- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
