Hi Jing, It may be a bit early because this feature has just been released. That said - solutions engineering at Joyent is now recommending that you use CNS (https://github.com/joyent/triton-cns) for doing HA with your load balancers. There is a blog post on it here: https://www.joyent.com/blog/introducing-triton-container-name-service
Typically, you would use it in one of two modes: 1) You would use to store address records that would be used to populate backends by a hardware load balancer or a virtual load balancer appliance like the (Brocade Virtual Traffic Manager) that supported sophisticated health-checking any its own HA mode. 2) You would use it to set a CNAME record for your own domain that would map to the service records of all of the active front-end load balancers (Nginx, HAProxy, etc) that are fronting your application. You will find that the TTL has a very similar recovery time to VRRP. Also, once it is set up it is much easier to replicate as a pattern for other applications. Thanks, Elijah Zupancic On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:45 PM 王靖 <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi，all > I want to setup a load balancer for SmartOS, and we've tried ilb( > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/servers-storage-admin/loadbalancedapp-1653020.html) > and nginx(http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/load_balancing.html). I am > wondering if you could shed light on suggesting of some better software > packages? Thanks very much. > > Besides the load balancer, I also have another two questions > 1. SmartOS High Availability > I’ve tried Wckamole(http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/load_balancing.html), > vippy(https://github.com/postwait/vippy), ucarp( > http://www.admin-magazine.com/Archive/2014/24/Creating-SmartOS-zones-using-UCARP). > Could you please recommend some other more powerful software to me? Thanks > very much. > > 2. What can we benefit from SmartOS VRRP( > https://wiki.smartos.org/display/DOC/Managing+NICs#ManagingNICs-AddingVRRPnicstoVMs > ) > After I read the SmarOS wiki which describes the vrrp feature. I think > it is quite different from what I read from the Oracle document( > https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/821-1453/gkfly.html#gkfjl). It > seems that the Solaris vrrp can achieve the virtual router HA but > the SmarOS vvrp can only achieve the virtual nic HA. They are different. > If my understanding is wrong, please correct me. Thanks very much. > > Thanks > Jing > Briphant Technologies Co.,Ltd > > > > > > *smartos-discuss* | Archives > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/27862676-98b28ad9> | > Modify > <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> > Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com> > ------------------------------------------- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
