On 25 April 2016 at 15:58, Garrett D'Amore <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure Robert. Still, even if we wind up *not* doing a common framework, I’d > rather see an ioctl to deal with this than abusing the uscsi ioctl. Even an > sd-specific ioctl would be superior to USCSI, IMO, and this could be a > stepping stone to a more neutral common implementation in the future.
Why is this an abuse of the uscsi ioctl? What is it _for_, if not sending SCSI commands to targets from outside the kernel? -- Joshua M. Clulow UNIX Admin/Developer http://blog.sysmgr.org ------------------------------------------- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
