On 9/4/16 6:03 , Rob Seastrom wrote: > > Has anyone else noticed that ziostat does not seem to be providing correct > rolling updates in current-ish SmartOS? > > Behavior observed when running "ziostat -Z 5" on 20160804T173241Z was > plausible rollup stats on first output, and then zeroes for all metrics, even > when deliberately flogging the disk subsystem: > > [root@80-c1-6e-64-9b-24 ~]# ziostat -Z 5 > r/s kr/s actv wsvc_t asvc_t %b zone > 0.0 0.1 0.0 28.1 5.7 0 global (0) > 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 1.6 0 8d31ffe3 (1) > 0.2 0.4 0.0 2.6 2.4 0 a450a6d4 (2) > r/s kr/s actv wsvc_t asvc_t %b zone > 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 global (0) > 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 8d31ffe3 (1) > 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 a450a6d4 (2) > r/s kr/s actv wsvc_t asvc_t %b zone > 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 global (0) > 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 8d31ffe3 (1) > 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 a450a6d4 (2) > > We're getting plausible numbers when doing the same thing on a (different > machine, same hardware) 20160218T022556Z global zone. > > No, I haven't resorted to a binary search to figure out when the regression > went in.
Hi Rob, I'm not sure entirely as to what's caused this. However, for now I've filed https://smartos.org/bugview/OS-5649 to track this. Thank you for reporting it. Robert ------------------------------------------- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
