----- On Sep 6, 2016, at 5:45 PM, Frederick W. Soucy [email protected] wrote:

> On Tue, 06 Sep 2016 at 22:20:10 +0100, Chris Ridd wrote:
>>Somewhat off-topic, except I’m using Samba from pkgsrc in a native zone on
>>SmartOS…
>>
>>Does anyone have any hints on how to optimize Samba read (and write, to an
>>extent) performance? I’m using Samba 4.2.1nb5 from pkgsrc. I’m serving from a
>>zone, which is why I’m not using the in-kernel cifs server.
>>
>>Using iperf I can get 940Mbps over bge0 to my Mac (wired). I can get something
>>over 130MB/s if I dd a file from my pool to /dev/null, but reading the same
>>file over Samba from my Mac (wired) using cp only nets me ~ 35MB/s.
>>
>>I’m mostly reading/writing multi-GB files (videos), and I don’t have an SLOG 
>>or
>>L2ARC device yet.
>>
>>Anyway, something in Samba is only giving me about 25% of my underlying pool’s
>>read performance and I’d be interested in knowing how folks here have tuned
>>Samba. Most advice I see on the net is Linux-specific, cargo-cultish, and more
>>to the point, doesn’t make a difference :-)
>>
>>Thanks in advance,
>>
>>Chris
>>
>>
>>
> Afraid i have no insight as to why your samba isn't performing just want to
> state that you can use the built-in SMB server inside an OS zone. It's the NFS
> server that is unavailable inside an OS zone. At $HOME all my media is served
> from an OS zone with a delegated dataset via svc:/network/smb/server:default
> and it is able to push ~100MB/s from an atom c2550.

is there a way to tie the in-kernel cifs server to a samba nt4-domain or active
directory instance? in that way, samba could authenticate the users but the
faster cifs service would provide the data ...


-------------------------------------------
smartos-discuss
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to