Virtualization win systems - in common, at 30 per cent more expensive always. Especially if VM is actively working
2016-10-04 23:57 GMT+03:00 Tiraen <[email protected]>: > It all very much depends on the processor itself (and even the same CPU > may work in different). > > A little is not correct to compare in this regard, Linux systems and > windows > > Since they have fundamentally different ways of working with CPU (CLR in > windows and things like that) > > If in general - what you see - it's normal > > I have a couple of servers running in the tougher times > > > > > > > > 2016-10-04 23:41 GMT+03:00 Ian Collins <[email protected]>: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm not sure id this is a KVM or a Windows issue, but when I allocate 32 >> cores (on a 32 physical core box) to a windows KVM, the machine load >> average is around 12% while Windows task manager shows 1%. With 16 cores, >> the LA is 3-4%. I can't help but wonder what impact this has on the VM's >> performance when it is fully loaded as well as its impact on the other >> client systems. >> >> A Linux KVM using the same package configuration sits around 0% when idle. >> >> Has anyone else seen this or know of an explanation? >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Ian. >> > > > > -- > With best regards, > > Vyacheslav Yakushev, > > Unix system administrator > -- With best regards, Vyacheslav Yakushev, Unix system administrator ------------------------------------------- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
