That’s really interesting… and counter-intuitave. I’ll test that out on one of our boxes out-of-hours and see if there’s any difference.
> On 22 Mar 2017, at 13:14, Greg Treantos <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well I see much better network performance and no more CPU utilization. Using > iperf I would never see above 400Mb/s and the link would drop. Using e1000 I > can get sustained 930Mb/s and no drops. > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Patrick O'Sullivan via smartos-discuss > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Thanks. If you can share your working version I'll go looking for that. > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Adam Richmond-Gordon > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Reduced network performance / higher host CPU usage, but if you’re not > > pushing a lot of packets through those zones I doubt you’ll see much of a > > difference. > > > > On 22 Mar 2017, at 10:39, Greg Treantos <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > I see no downside in using the e1000 driver. > > > > > > > -- > Greg > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregtreantos > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregtreantos> > smartos-discuss | Archives > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/28443474-1732e24d> | > Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> Your Subscription ------------------------------------------- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
