> On Sep 27, 2017, at 3:10 AM, Antoine Jacoutot <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello. > > So I made a mistake today replacing a faulty drive in a RAID10 setup. > i.e. 4 mirrors in a pool > I stupidly detached the drive (c7) which means I lost one mirror. > Surprisingly, > it _seems_ everything is still working fine. > That said I now have this:
What you have shouldn't have be the result of a "zpool replace" command. Can you share the output of "zpool history zones"? -- richard > > # zpool status > pool: zones > state: ONLINE > scan: scrub repaired 2.71M in 44h26m with 0 errors on Wed Sep 20 10:55:06 2017 > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > zones ONLINE 0 0 0 > mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c1t5000CCA012B1089Dd0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c2t5000CCA012AEAFC1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c3t5000CCA0124510DDd0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c4t5000CCA012A1FF61d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c5t5000CCA012B06399d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c6t5000CCA012AEF71Dd0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c8t5000CCA012AD8ED9d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c7t5000CCA012B1A9F5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > errors: No known data errors > > Meaning I no longer have mirror-3 but instead 2 drives participating in the > RAID0 pool. That's obviously not good in case one of these 2 drives dies. My > question, although I doubt this is possible, is: is there any way I could > recreate mirror-3 with c7 and c8 without data loss? > > Thanks! > > -- > Antoine > ------------------------------------------- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
