Hi Timo! On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:09:57 +0200, Timo Jyrinki wrote: > 2009/6/9 Luca Capello <l...@pca.it>: >> Nothing is ready, because I need to tag the upstream version as well. > > Would it be too early to "deprecate" xserver-glamo in favor of > xserver-xorg-video-glamo by adding also > CONFIG_MFD_GLAMO_FB_XGLAMO_WORKAROUND=n to Debian's config.gta02?
The full description reads:
config MFD_GLAMO_FB_XGLAMO_WORKAROUND
bool "Smedia Glamo 336x/337x Xglamo rotation workaround"
depends on MFD_GLAMO_FB
help
This is a workaround for a Xglamo bug. This should be fixed
in Xglamo and not in kernel space.
If unsure, say N.
Can this be related to <http://bugs.debian.org/529078>?
> Generally I have at least no more problems with a "real" X.org + glamo
> DDX driver than with xserver-glamo,
1) What does DDX mean here? Specifically, which branch (master,
dri-aware, exa-via-dri) is the Glamo driver you use built from?
2) Which virtual keyboard do you use? xserver-xorg-video-glamo and
matchbox-keyboard do not play well together:
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/smartphones-userland/2009-May/001483.html
If the bug is present on any Openmoko image (including the fso ones),
then it is a matchbox-keyboard bug: since there has not been any new
SVN commit for matchbox-keyboard, I guess that we should track it
down (is XTest support the real problem?) and fix it.
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
pgpnKVTTUOrKZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Smartphones-userland mailing list Smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/smartphones-userland
