Am Dienstag, den 19.10.2010, 19:51 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 04:04:17PM +0200, Daniele Ricci wrote: > >studying my desktop system i found out that notification spec is a > >little bit different from the most recent (official) one, version 0.9: > >http://people.canonical.com/~agateau/notifications-1.1/index.html > > > >Seems that people in Canonical have changed a few things... i checked > >it out, it's just icon management: more hints for icon data or icon > >path. > >Should we take this as reference? Anyhow it's backward compatible, so... > > I believe this is not Ubuntu. I see no reason to derive from official > standards just to follow Ubuntu. Or did I miss some more substantial > argument? > > > - Jonas > I like the indicator with the dbusmenu and it should be possible to integrate this into E or mokosuite in a finger friendly way. > _______________________________________________ > Smartphones-userland mailing list > Smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/smartphones-userland
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Smartphones-userland mailing list Smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/smartphones-userland
