Michael 'Mickey' Lauer <mic...@vanille-media.de> writes: > Hi Łukasz,
Hi Michael, > >> I not able to call *500 with the following in /var/log/fsogsmd.log: >> >> 2011-03-21T22:53:13.713861Z [INFO] libfsotransport <0710:1>: SRC: "D*500;" >> -> [ "OK" ] >> 2011-03-21T22:53:13.754515Z [INFO] libfsotransport <0710:3>: URC: [ "%CPI: >> 1,9,0,0,0,0,"*500",129,"006100610061",,0" ] >> 2011-03-21T22:53:13.756114Z [INFO] libfsotransport <0710:1>: URC: [ "NO >> CARRIER" ] > > Nothing we can do about that. For some reason, the modem does not want > to dial that number. Thanks for the quick answer. Fortunately, this time (in a fresh shr-unstable reflesh) switching on the gsm was a proper fix :) -- sorry for the noise. I answered to the `please report' in the log because I also had those "No handler for..." (below) in two shr-unstable installations (the same day before) after upgrading them where FR refused to dial for no obvious reason so I thought this "No handler for..." is some missing feature causing no dial. Cheers, Łukasz > >> 2011-03-21T22:53:13.757053Z [INFO] libfsotransport <0710:3>: URC: [ "%CPI: >> 1,8,0,0,,,,,,,0" ] >> 2011-03-21T22:53:13.758738Z [INFO] libfsotransport <0710:3>: URC: [ "%CPI: >> 1,7,0,0,,,,,,,0" ] >> 2011-03-21T22:53:13.783821Z [INFO] libfsotransport <0710:2>: SRC: "+CLCC" >> -> [ "OK" ] >> 2011-03-21T22:53:13.803659Z [INFO] libfsotransport <0710:2>: URC: [ "EXT: >> I" ] >> 2011-03-21T22:53:13.804162Z [WARN] TiCalypsoModem <4C>: No handler for URC >> EXT w/ rhs I, please report to Mickey <smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org> >> 2011-03-21T22:53:13.814646Z [INFO] libfsotransport <0710:2>: URC: [ "Both >> AEC and Noise reduction are active" ] >> 2011-03-21T22:53:13.815096Z [WARN] TiCalypsoModem <4C>: No handler for URC >> Both AEC and Noise reduction are active w/ rhs , please report to Mickey >> <smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org> >> 2011-03-21T22:53:13.816082Z [INFO] libfsotransport <0710:2>: SRC: "%N0187" >> -> [ "OK" ] > > That's a red herring due to some slight format violations. I could > silence these two, but it would probably not be worth the additional > comparisons. > > Sorry, I don't have a more helpful answer. > > Cheers, _______________________________________________ Smartphones-userland mailing list Smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/smartphones-userland
