On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:22:45AM +0100, "C. Bergstr?m" wrote: > So basically what I'm reading in this is when I refactor the build > system I may as well evaluate updating to SQLite3. One of the first > comments seemed to imply that with SQLite3 there would be an increase in > binary size or some other disadvantage.
Binary size for configd is not likely to be a problem. Using SQLite3 would be a very good thing indeed. I figure the SMF team will cringe at the idea of linking with a shared SQLite3; we'll see! Nico --
