On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 07:11:21PM -0700, Jordan Brown wrote: > Nicolas Williams wrote: > >Well, yes; that implies strict shutdown ordering, at least for the last > >one or two services. > > Well, sure. Isn't sequencing startup and shutdown SMF's job?
I was alluding to the fact that for a long time SMF didn't (does it now?) get shutdown ordering right.
