On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:31:21AM -0400, James Carlson wrote: > Nicolas Williams writes: > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 07:59:50AM -0400, James Carlson wrote: > > > In other words, it simply has _never_ done what the user thought it > > > would do. > > > > But it did do one thing that lsvcrun does not: it sourced files ending > > in .sh into the *same* shell process running /sbin/rc2. > > True. That part is now broken, but that's not the issue under > discussion here. (Check the subject line again ...)
Sure, but the bug glared at me in that thread. I should have changed the subject, maybe. > [...] > I agree that the ".sh" functionality is broken, but, please, let's use > a different thread for that. Done, see new Subject. In-Reply-To left alone. Personally, I'd not file a CR here unless I knew of something that was broken. But if someone files a CR about this I think it should either be accepted or closed as will not fix. Nico --
