David Bustos wrote: > Quoth yifan on Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:01:13AM +0800: > >> If the dependency mechanism is not required any more, do you think it is >> still necessary to create dynamic smf instances for vrrp instances? >> > > Not unless you want them for some other reason. Another reason could be > managing separate daemons for each instance, or advertising the state of > some behavior represented by the instance. I don't think the latter is > a particularly good idea in the long-term.
By current design the vrrpd daemon manages all instances -- I see no necessity of using separate daemons -- thus the first reason doesn't apply either. So I think the conclusion is obvious. Thanks for your advice! Yifan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/smf-discuss/attachments/20081215/f5a4f4aa/attachment.html>
