* Peter Tribble <peter.tribble at gmail.com> [2007-10-08 20:43]: > On 10/8/07, Stephen Hahn <sch at sun.com> wrote: > > > > Finally, svccfg export (and archive) output can be placed under SCM > > control and managed, just like the existing files. Site practices can > > incorporate that capability immediately. > > That's sort of what I do at the moment, saving svccfg archive. It would > be nice to have something that could monitor our SMF repositories the > way that RANCID monitors our network devices. (For list, see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RANCID ) > (There are some annoyances with the svccfg archive output. > Identical systems - or even the same system at different times - > create different output, so you need to eyeball any differences > to see if they're significant.) Let's improve archive (or introduce archive --strict) to not do that: do you have some diffs of this kind that you could share? - Stephen -- sch at sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
