On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 11:58:16AM -0800, Jordan Brown (Sun) wrote: > Nicolas Williams wrote: > >>Perhaps, but one of the things that the SMF designers decided (and I > >>agree) is that controlling those two things independently (as is > >>traditional on UNIX) is the source of many problems, and so they > >>deliberately made it *not* the simple case. The simple case is that > > > >I'd like to hear that from the designers of SMF. I recall a > >conversation about start/stop quite a while back where I left with the > >impression that the team hadn't considered it. > > Check out Mike Shapiro's message of 10/28/2007, where he says:
With all due respect for Mike, I'd like to hear about this from the SMF team. > >(b) Temporary should *not* be the default. This one I believe we got > >right. Agreed, but we're not talking about defaults here.
