Liane Praza writes: > Sorry Garrett, for not seeing this sooner. > > "Garrett D'Amore" writes: > > I'm trying to debug a problem with SMF & inetd as part of the removal > > of in.tnamed. Basically, I can't seem to figure out why inetd still > > spews this message on the first reboot after an upgrade: > > > > /var/adm/messages.0:May 12 22:45:11 surya-x4200 inetd[28174]: [ID 702911 > > daemon.error] Failed to update state of instance > > svc:/network/tname:default in repository: entity not found > > /var/adm/messages.0:May 12 22:45:11 surya-x4200 inetd[28174]: [ID 702911 > > daemon.error] Failed to update state of instance > > svc:/network/tname:default in repository: No such file or directory > > > > What I can't tell, is why inetd even knows about network/tname. It > > should be _gone_. > > > > I've posted a webrev of what I've figured out so far: > > > > http://cr.grommit.com/~gdamore/6656092/webrev/ > > I'm perplexed as well. The code in postinstall should have done it. > > (The changes to generic_limited_net.xml are for sourcebase cleanliness, > not completion of the delete. The whole prophist file is a pre-s10 > remenant and should/will just be deleted now that upgrades from pre-s10 > builds are no longer supported.)
I should clarify... pre-*FCS* S10 builds. I'm not talking about S9 or S8 upgrades. > > Does one of the inetd upgrade experts think I've missed some inetd magic? > > I'll keep looking too, but wanted to get the mail out since it seems > nobody had responded to you yet. (Sorry, I was on vacation and am > trying to catch up.) > > To clarify, the message only appears during the first boot after upgrade, > not a subsequent one? > > liane
