Quoth John Levon on Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 01:37:17AM +0100: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:01:10AM -0700, David Bustos wrote: > > Quoth John Levon on Wed, May 30, 2007 at 11:20:13PM +0100: > > > We've noticed that if a start method returns 1, then the processes in the > > > contract are not killed (the contract is just orphaned). Is this the > > > intended > > > behaviour? I've failed to find documentation indicating that methods are > > > expected to call smf_kill_contract() in this case. > > > > This should only happen if you declared the service to be transient. > > For contract services, we go into 'assured kill' mode, where we SIGKILL > > the contract once a second until it's empty. See method_run(), I think. > > The assured kill only seems to apply to stop methods, and is skipped anyway if > the exit code is non-zero. Does this code need a judiciously-placed > contract_kill() call?
You're right, though I think we need to do the assured kill. If you don't file a bug, I will. David
