Thanks Stephen, that explains a lot. What would be the recommended naming for my service A or B?
Lubos. Stephen Hahn wrote: > * Lubomir Petrik <Lubomir.Petrik at Sun.COM> [2007-12-06 16:07]: > >> c) Allow only single_instance and name that single instance >> application/XY:v1 and application/XY:v2 >> >> Frankly I was surprised that c) works. I'd expect that importing a >> service with an existing service name when both are marked as >> single_instance would overwrite the previous service instance XY:v1 with >> XY:v2, not that the system will actually keep even the v1 instance. >> >> So what exactly does the single_instance do and what would you recommend >> to use? >> > > Alas, enforcing the <single_instance /> tag was never implemented in > any of the restarters. > > - Stephen > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/smf-discuss/attachments/20071207/85125163/attachment.html>
