Lubomir Petrik - Sun Microsystems wrote: > I believe starting these processes is separate contract is exactly what > I want. Unless you have a better solution?
Sounds like it is. Explicit use of contracts would allow your master daemon to track these child processes even after the daemon has been restarted, but if that isn't important, ctrun would work just fine. > Is there any significant overhead for a short running process (0,3-2sec) > to be started as a new contract? No. Contract creation isn't particularly expensive. Dave
