Thanks Keith for providing a good summary of the problem space and the 
possible ways that restore could work.

My initial thought was that a restore would be a pure overwrite. 
However as you point out that might not actually be useful because it 
could quite easily create a "broken" configuration.  The merging cases 
certainly look complex and possibly equally prone to not giving the 
admin quite what they would expect.

Maybe we need to take a step back and work out exactly what the usage 
cases are for why you would need to restore a backup of of the 
repository independently from a normal full system dump/restore. At this 
time I can't work out when I'd ever want to do a full repository restore.

Exactly what type of situations do we expect the system to get into that 
the admin would need to be concerned with a previous state of the whole 
repository independently from the current or enhanced profile systems.

I can see a usage case for cloning a repository configuration between 
multiple installations but currently that feels more like a job for the 
enhanced profiles work than a dump/restore.  Particularly if you 
consider that the admin intent of a set of configuration changes might 
be at "high level" services but the clone happens between to machines of 
different types (say x86 to SPARC or between different SPARC platforms) 
where there are critical platform specific services (this is where your 
merge comments come into play).

--
Darren J Moffat

Reply via email to