> > But then several property groups will have the same name.
>
> Why not
>
> <property_group name='SUNW,binfile' type='application'>
> <propval file='audit_binfile.so' type='astring'/>
Well, I'm not hung up on SUNW, or no SUNW, . What I really
do what is something straight forward for the admin.
Such as
svccfg -s auditd setprop binfile/enable = true
svccfg -s auditd setprop binfile/minfree = 20
svccfg -s auditd setprop binfile/dirs = "/var/audit,\
/var1/audit,/var2/audit"
I don't expect the path name to change (thought it could).
> > <property_group name='config' type='application'>
> > <propval name='flags' type='astring' value='' />
>
> Is this supposed to be a bitfield? If so, count or integer would be
> more appropriate.
No, flags is an astring. For example, "all,^+ss,^+as"
> > <property_group name='binfile' type='SUNW,audit_plugin'>
>
> Yeah, this should be name="SUNW,binfile" type="application".
See above svccfg. I "audit_binfile" perhaps to match the man
page audit_binfile(5); audit_syslog(5).
>
> > <propval name='name' type='astring' value='audit_binfile.so' />
>
> I think "path" or "file" or "filename" might be a better name for this.
"path" or "file" or even "plugin" as today in audit_control(5).
may all be appropriate -- "name" was my earlier suggestion ;-(
Gary..
