Quoth David Finberg on Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 03:41:46PM -0500:
> I should have been more clear. The property group 'dcs' being of type
> 'dependency' and not 'application' is what is confusing svccfg and SMF's
> inheritance. It seems that comes from
>
> /var/svc/manifest/platform/sun4u/dscp.xml
>
> ...
> <dependent
> name='dcs'
> grouping='optional_all'
> restart_on='none'>
> <service_fmri value='svc:/platform/sun4u/dcs:default' />
> </dependent>
>
> Are there standards on naming property groups? And if so, where?
> Regardless, naming your config group the same name as your service is
> asking for a heap of trouble.
Yes, dependents are supposed to be named with some form of the
dependency's name as a prefix, to avoid precisely this. This violation
is
6458309 dscp names dependents badly
A fix is in progress.
David
