On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 01:16:23PM -0800, Michael Shapiro wrote:

> One final comment here: although the above mechanism could be used for ipmievd
> and definitely is needed for a few other things, it's also worth noting that
> ipmievd's needs could be expressed in a different way: namely as a device
> dependency.

Indeed, this would also fix the same problem with the Xen services, where we
can naturally depend upon one of the Xen devices.

regards
john

Reply via email to