On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 01:16:23PM -0800, Michael Shapiro wrote: > One final comment here: although the above mechanism could be used for ipmievd > and definitely is needed for a few other things, it's also worth noting that > ipmievd's needs could be expressed in a different way: namely as a device > dependency.
Indeed, this would also fix the same problem with the Xen services, where we can naturally depend upon one of the Xen devices. regards john