Darren Reed wrote: > While on the subject of inetd, are there any planned ARC > cases to bring the command line of inetadm into line with > that of svcadm and others? > > Can we make an inetdadm (the intuitive name) that has > enable/disable on the command line and turn inetadm > into a wrapper to provide backward compatibility? > > I suppose the opposite of this is true too - can we bring > in an inetadm that understands a command line that uses > enable/disable and just calls inetadm? >
Add your 2 cents to 6183392. Dave
