Tony Nguyen wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
>> I don't get how I'm supposed to use this. It returns a const property
>> (as it
>> seems it should) but all the ways to iterate over the contents use a
>> non-const
>> argument. Seems pretty useless, which is why I suppose it's not used
>> (and why
>> the manpage is totally wrong).
>>
I missed the piece of code that answers your question :^) Basically, I
cast the argument to be a non-const in the scf_simple_prop_next* calls.
-tony
>>
> John,
>
> I found the below snippet of code to work fine for me and was planning
> to blog about the use of these interface once my code is integrated. I
> do agree that it's quite confusing and the manpage is not insufficient.
>
> -tony
>
> ...
> scf_simple_app_props_t *config_pg = NULL;
> scf_simple_prop_t const *pressure_prop = NULL;
> scf_simple_prop_t const *reconfig_int_prop = NULL;
> ...
> ...
> if ((config_pg = scf_simple_app_props_get(h, RCAP_FMRI)) ==
> NULL) {
> warn(gettext("Failed to get configuration "
> "information \n"));
> ....
> ....
> if ((pressure_prop = scf_simple_app_props_search(config_pg,
> "config_params", "pressure")) == NULL && (numvals =
> scf_simple_prop_numvalues(pressure_prop)) <= 0) {
> warn(gettext("Couldn't find property `%s' in property "
> "group `%s'\n"), "pressure", "config_params");
> goto err;
> } else {
> if ((tmp_int = scf_simple_prop_next_integer(
> (scf_simple_prop_t *) pressure_prop)) != NULL)
> _rcfg->rcfg_memory_cap_enforcement_pressure =
> *tmp_int;
>
> if (_rcfg->rcfg_memory_cap_enforcement_pressure < 0)
> _rcfg->rcfg_memory_cap_enforcement_pressure = 0;
> debug("cap max pressure: %d%%\n",
> _rcfg->rcfg_memory_cap_enforcement_pressure);
> }
>
