Hi Shwetha,
Le 3 f?vr. 09 ? 10:41, Shwetha Srinivasan - Sun Microsystems -
Bangalore India a ?crit :
> Hi Nicholas,
> That's right, NTP will not start if there is no name service
> configured.
Bad idea IMHO.
I know there was discussion here about that. I didn't follow all of
them (sorry).
I'm surprised of a such modification. What about multicast client ?
What about IP@ in ntp.conf ?
Nicolas
>
> Thanks,
> Shwetha
>
>
>
> Nicolas Dorfsman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I missed the first ping.
>>
>> A dumb question : does your modification mean ntp will not start
>> if there's no name service configured ????
>>
>> Nicolas
>>
>>
>> Le 3 f?vr. 09 ? 09:36, Shwetha Srinivasan - Sun Microsystems -
>> Bangalore India a ?crit :
>>
>>> A gentle reminder.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shwetha
>>>
>>> Shwetha Srinivasan - Sun Microsystems - Bangalore India wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I've made changes for CR 6748656. Request you to review the changes
>>>> for me.
>>>>
>>>> Bug description: XNTPD fails to find ntp servers since it can't
>>>> resolve hostnames, hence clock skews .
>>>> Description of the fix: A dependency on name-services has been
>>>> added
>>>> to NTP, so that the name services are up and running before NTP
>>>> starts.
>>>>
>>>> Webrev for Solaris 10:
>>>> Patch gate: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~shwethas/
>>>> webrev_patch/
>>>> Feature gate: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~shwethas/webrev_feature/
>>>>
>>>> Webrev for Solaris Nevada:
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~shwethas/webrev_nevada_6748656/
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Shwetha
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> smf-discuss mailing list
>>> smf-discuss at opensolaris.org
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> smf-discuss mailing list
> smf-discuss at opensolaris.org
>
