> Brian Smith wrote: > > Liane Praza wrote: > >> Brian Smith wrote: > >> One reason is to support pkgadd -R -- if you > deliver in > >> /var/svc/manifest, your the class i. script > doesn't have to do anything > >> in that case. If you use the "manifest" class > that's delivered with > >> S10u2 and above, you don't have to import your own > CASs. I pretty > >> strongly recommend you use the system's delivered > "manifest" class. > > > > Thank you. I have been using > http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-0406 as > > the documentation for building my package. That > document doesn't include > > "manifest" and "rbac", both of which I need. Where > is the new documentation > > that documents these newer standard classes? Are > they part of the official > > ABI? > > I know we intended for "manifest" to be a supported > class, but it > doesn't seem like we got around to updating that > book. We should. I > don't know offhand about the stability of "rbac". > Liane, Brian,
The book you cite is a Solaris 10 book. I have updated the original doc bug that was submitted almost three years ago: http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6423740 But I am wondering now whether this is still a high priority to fix or whether we should just focus on making sure the information is in the OpenSolaris documentation. Brian, it sounds like if you found newer documentation, you wouldn't have been using the Solaris 10 book - is that correct? I see some documentation here "SMF Concepts - System Administration Guide: Basic Administration" http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/SYSADV1/dzhid.html#esini and there might be more. Have you by now found the answers to your questions in the OpenSolaris documentation? Please give me your opinion: Is it still important to update the Solaris 10 Application Packaging guide? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org
